J.Ahamed Khan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.01.2023 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA 1.J.Ahamed Khan 2.A.Jahir Hussain

...Petitioners/Accused No.1& 2

-vsThe State represented by The Inspector of Police, Sethubavachatiram Police Station, Thanjavur District.

Crime No.587 of 2022

...Respondent/Complainant

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C, praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in connection with Cr.No.587 of 2022 on the file of the respondent Police.

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Venkateshwar, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottai Chamy Government Advocate (Crl.side) ****

O R D E R

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC and Section 4 of TNPHW Act in Crime No.587 of 2022 on the file of the respondent Police, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution, as per the de-facto complainant, is that the de-facto complainant and her husband are running a grocery shop and on 15.12.2022, the accused persons have come to the said grocery shop and abused the de-facto complainant in filthy language and attacked her and criminally intimidated her with dire consequences. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned Counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocents and a false complaint has been given. He would also submit that the petitioners are running a shop adjacent to the de-facto complainant's shop and due to a wordy quarrel, the first petitioner has given a complaint against the de-facto complainant and only as a counter blast, the present complaint has been given. He would also submit that the petitioners are ready to abide by any stringent conditions, that may be imposed on them. 1/3

4.The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) would submit that on 15.12.2022, the accused persons have come to the shop run by the de-facto complainant and abused the de-facto complainant in filthy language and attacked her and criminally intimidated her with dire consequences. He would also submit that it is a case and case in counter and he would oppose for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5.Heard the learned Counsel. Taking into consideration the facts and submissions and also on perusing the materials available on record including the F.I.R., this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pervurani, Thanjavur District, on condition that the petitioners shall execute bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. [c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

sd/- 06/01/2023 / TRUE COPY / /01/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

cmr 2/3

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PERVURANI, THANJAVUR DISTRICT. 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR DISTRICT @ KUMBAKONAM.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SETHUBAVACHATIRAM POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.328 of 2023 Date :06/01/2023 RK/BUC/SAR-3 (24/01/2023) 3P/5C 3/3