Lakshmanasamy v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Keeranur

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 07/01/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY

1. Lakshmanasamy

2. Velumany ... Petitioners/Accused Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Keeranur Police Station, Dindigul District.

Crime No.278 of 2025..

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.T.Ramasamy, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PRAYER :- C-33AB. For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.278 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- 1/6

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 180(1), 296(b) and 351(3) Of BNS, 2023, r/w. Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002, in Crime No.278 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, the petitioners along with other accused persons have abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and attacked him and caused injuries and also threatened with dire consequences. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that petitioners are ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 2/6

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that it is a simple injury and the injured treated and discharged from the hospital on the same day. It is a case and case in counter. The 2nd petitioner was assaulted by the defacto complainant and her son and got head injury and spinal injury and took treatment in the Government Hospital, Palani. However, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and also considering the nature of offence, and it is a case and case in counter, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, on condition that each of the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like 3/6

sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Palani, Dindigul District, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy is made ready and on further conditions that:

[a]the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required;

[c]the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[d]the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate 4/6

action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners are released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.

07.01.2026 PJL TO 1.Judicial Magistrate, Palani, Dindigul District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Keeranur Police Station, Dindigul District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

S.SRIMATHY,J PJL

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.182 of 2026 Date : 07/01/2026 6/6