Madras High CourtTR CMP(MD)/118/2011dismissed as infructuous

C.Antony Muthu, (Died) v. D.Mohanraj

2020-11-10Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan2 pages

Tr.C.M.P(MD)No.118 and 119 of 2011 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.11.2020

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN Tr.C.M.P(MD)Nos.118 and 119 of 2011 and M.P(MD) Nos.1 and 1 of 2011

1. C.Antony Muthu (Died)

2. Anto Femil ... Petitioners/2nd and 3rd defendants [in both TR.CMPs] -Vs1. D.Mohan Raj ... 1st respondent/plaintiff

2. Michel Latha

3. Anto Joina ... 2nd and 3rd Respondents/1st and 4th defendants [1st petitioner died. Memo is recorded [in both TR.CMPs] Memo USR No.4982/21.10.2016, vide Court order dated 21.10.2016 made in TR.C.M.P(MD).No.118 and 119 of 2011] Common Prayer: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petitions filed under Section 24 of C.P.C., to withdraw the O.S.Nos.63 and 64 of 2011, on the file of the Sub Court, Aruppukottai and transfer it to the file of the Sub Court, Nagercoil.

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Manimaran [in both TR.CMPs] For Respondents :M/s.I.Saliya Khan for R1 No Appearance for R2 [in both TR.CMPs] COMMON ORDER These Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petitions have been filed by the petitioner, to withdraw the O.S.Nos.63 and 64 of 2011, on the file of the Sub Court, Aruppukottai and transfer it to the file of the Sub Court, Nagercoil.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Counsel appearing for the first respondent. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Tr.C.M.P(MD)No.118 and 119 of 2011

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, would submit that the matter has become infructuous.

4. Recording the said submission, these Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No Costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) pkn Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

1. The Sub Judge, Aruppukottai.

2. The Sub Judge, Nagercoil.

3. The Record Keeper, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai(2 copies). Tr.C.M.P(MD)Nos.118 and 119 of 2011 10.11.2020 KM(CO) TR(23.11.2020) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2