← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/351/2022dismissed

Gowrisangar @ Gowrishangar v. The Inspector Of Police

2022-01-10Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.351 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.01.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD) No.351 of 2022 1.Gowrisangar @ Gowrishangar 2.Raja @ Raja Shankar 3.C.Kuperan @ Kupenthiran 4.Uthrapaty 5.Monogaran @ Manogaran .. Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 5 Vs.

State represented by The Inspector of Police, Athanakottai Police Station, Pudukottai District.

Crime No.198 of 2021 .. Respondent / Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 439 (1)(b) r/w 482 of Cr.P.C, to relax the condition imposed by the Special Court for trial of SC/ST Act Cases, Pudukottai in Crl.M.P.No.1005 of 2021 vide its order, dated 17.12.2021.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.L.Dhilipan Pandian For Respondent : Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking relaxation of the condition imposed by the Special Court for trial of SC/ST Act Cases, Pudukottai in Crl.M.P.No.1005 of 2021 vide its order, dated 17.12.2021.

2.By the order dated 17.12.2021, the trial Court directed the petitioner to appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for 30 days and once in 15 days until Charge sheet is filed. The grievance of the petitioner is that since he is working as a Government Employee, he is unable to comply the condition and seeks to relax the same.

3.This type of prayer cannot be entertained by this Court and this petition is not maintainable and liable to be dismissed. The petitioner can approach the Court concerned and workout his remedy. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.351 of 2022 4.With the above liberty, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AD-II) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) TM Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To 1.The Special Judge, Special Court for trial of SC/ST Act Cases, Pudukottai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Athanakottai Police Station, Pudukottai District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.351 of 2022 10.01.2022 RK(25/01/2022) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2