G.Meenammal,(Died) v. S.Gori Bivi,
SA(MD). No.631 of 2013 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Tenth day of December Two Thousand and Nineteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice N.SATHISH KUMAR SA(MD). No.631 of 2013
1) G.MEENAMMAL,(died) ...Appellant/1st Respondent/Plaintiff
2) G.MUITHUKRISHNAN
3) G.SELVAM
4) KARUPPAYEE AMMAL ...Appellants (A 2 TO 4 ARE BROUGHT ON RECORD AS LRS OF , DECEASED SOLE APPELLANT VIDE COURT ORDER , DATED 23/9/19 MADE IN CMP.3701 TO 3703/19 IN , SA.631/2013) Vs 1 S.GORI BIVI ... 1st Respondent/Appellant/2nd Defendant 2 THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER (DISTRIBUTION), TN ELECTRICITY BOARD,, MADURAI DISTRIBUTION CIRCLE, METRO, EAST GATE, OFFICE AT NEW RAMNAD ROAD,MEENAKSHI NAGAR, MADURAI-9.
... 2nd Respondent/2nd Respondent/ 1st Defendant Prayer:- Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree of the Principal Subordinate Court, Madurai dated 19.08.2013 made in Appeal Suit No.97 of 2012, preferred against the judgment and decree of the court of the Principal District Munsif Court, Madurai made in Original Suit No.849 of 2009 dated 16.10.2012 DECREE:- This Second Appeal coming upon for hearing on this date, upon perusing the grounds of Appeal, the judgments and decrees of the Lower Appellate Court and the Court of First Instance and the material papers in the suit and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.J.BARATHAN, Advocate for the Appeallants and of Mr.M.RAJARAMAN,Advocate for the first Respondent and Mrs.RAJESWARI, Advocate for the second respondent, this Court doth order and decree as follows:-
(1) That the Judgment and Decree of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Madurai, dated 19.08.2013 made in Appeal Suit No.97 of 2012, reversing the judgment and decree of the Principal District Munsif, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
SA(MD). No.631 of 2013 Madurai, made in Original Suit No.849 of 2009 dated 16.10.2012, be and hereby are confirmed and this appeal is dismissed.
(2) That if the payments with regard to electricity charges has not been paid by the appellant the first defendant/2nd respondent herein be and hereby is at liberty to disconnect the electricity connection and (3)That there be no costs in this Appeal.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) TO
1. The Principal Subordinate Judge, Madurai
2. The Principal District Munsif, Madurai Copy to:
The Section Officer,V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 2 Copies +1 CC to M/s.M.RAJARAMAN, Advocate ( SR-104376[F] dated 11/12/2019 ) +1 CC to M/s.T.R.JEYAPALAM, Advocate ( SR-104593[F] dated 12/12/2019 ORDER DATED : 10/12/2019 ========================== DECREE ========================== SA(MD). No.631 of 2013 Nature of Decree:- Dismissing the Second Appeal preferred against the judgment and decree of the Principal Subordinate Court, Madurai dated 19.08.2013 made in Appeal Suit No.97 of 2012, preferred against the judgment and decree of the court of the Principal District Munsif Court, Madurai made in Original Suit No.849 of 2009 dated 16.10.2012 etc., as stated within.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ JMN(13.01.2020) 2P : 7C 2/2