← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/349/2021dismissed

Maruthu Malar Mannan v. The Inspector Of Police

2021-01-11Honourable Mr Justice K.Murali Shankar2 pages

CRL OP(MD). No.349 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 11/01/2021 PRESENT The Hon'ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR CRL OP(MD) No.349 of 2021 Maruthu Malar Mannan ... Petitioner/Accused No.7 Vs The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Ammainayakkanur Police Station, Dindigul District.

Crime No. 851 of 2020. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.Anbarasan.K., Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.R.Srinivasan, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.851 of 2020 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused No.7, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 01.12.2020 for the offences punishable under Sections 366 of IPC @ 364(A), 397 IPC, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with A1 to A5 said to have kidnapped the victim for ransom, that A-6 was informed by the prime accused persons to collect the amount of ransom from the family members of the victim and that petitioner also accompanied with A-6, at the time of collecting amount. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 01.12.2020.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

CRL OP(MD). No.349 of 2021 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) for the respondent would submit that the de-facto complainant is working in New Vision Land Promoters and that the petitioner along with A1 to A5 had kidnapped the victim for ransom and voluntarily caused hurt and committed robbery. He would further submit that the present petitioner also accompanied with the co-accused and committed robbery and that the investigation is still pending. 5.Considering the nature and seriousness of the offences alleged to have committed and also the facts the facts that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 01.12.2020 and that the investigation is still pending, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6.In the result, the Criminal Original petition stands dismissed.

sd/- 11/01/2021 / TRUE COPY / / /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO

1. THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI.

2. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AMMAINAYAKKANUR POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.349 of 2021 Date :11/01/2021 SJI SRS/KV/SAR-II/20.01.2021/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2