Radhan Kumar v. The Inspector Of Police
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.423 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.01.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.423 of 2022
1. Radhan Kumar
2. Rajeshwari
3. Kanagadurga
4. Balasubramaniyam ... Petitioners / Accused Nos.1 to 4 Vs.
1. The State rep. By, The Inspector of Police, All Women police station, Thirupparankundran, Madurai District.
(Crime No.21 of 2018) ... Respondent / Complainant
2. Sangeetha ... 2nd Respondent / Defacto Complainant Prayer: Criminal Original petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for records pertaining to the impugned charge sheet in C.C.No.41 of 2020 on the file of the learned Additional Mahila Court (Magistrate Level), Madurai, arising from FIR in Crime No.21 of 2018 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Rooban For R-1 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar, Government Advocate.
For R-2 : Mr.T.Sugadev * * *
O R D E R
Heard the learned counsel on either side.
2. This criminal original petition has been filed for quashing the impugned proceedings.
3. The defacto complainant Sangeetha is present before this Court through video conferencing. She has been duly identified by Ms.T.Muthupandiammal, WHC-3233, attached to the first respondent police station and the same has been duly confirmed by Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar, learned Government Advocate. The parties have filed a joint compromise memo. The defacto complainant states that she does not want to pursue the matter.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.423 of 2022
4. Since the defacto complainant herself does not want to pursue the matter, no purpose will be served in keeping the impugned prosecution alive. Therefore, the impugned proceedings are quashed. This criminal original petition is allowed. The joint compromise memo dated 30.12.2021 shall form part of the record. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(WRITS) /TRUE COPY/ / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Encl: Xerox Copy of Joint Compromise Memo PMU Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To:
1 The Additional Mahila Judge, Madurai.
2.The Inspector of Police, All Women police station, Thirupparankundran, Madurai District.
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
+2 CC to M/s.B.ROOBAN, Advocate ( SR-2342[F] dated 25/01/2022 ) Crl.O.P.(MD)No.423 of 2022 24.01.2022 MK/25.02.2022/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2