Deeptha, D/O. M. Kumaraswami v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Sixth day of June Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.10953 of 2015 DEEPTHA, ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No.4 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SOUTH GATE, MADURAI, CR NO. 19 OF 2015 RELATED TO OLD CR NO.14/2014 PENDING BEFORE THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION , JEEYAPURAM, TRICHY ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.N.ANANTHAPADMANABAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.V.RAJARAJAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as accused No.4 in Crime No.

19 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294 (b), 498(A), 323 and 506(i) IPC r/w. Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Women Harassment Act and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the accused have joined together and demanded additional dowry of Rs.10 lakhs and the husband of defacto complainant came in a drunken mood daily and harassed her. 3.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the sister-in-law of the defacto complainant and she is a permanent resident of United States of America and she is a green card holder. He would further submit that the entire allegations are made only against the first accused and the accused Nos.

2 and 3 were already granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.19086 of 2014. 4.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) and perused the records.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Bodinaickkanur, Theni District and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 26/06/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BODINAICKKANUJR. 2 DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI DISTRICT. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SOUTH GATE, MADURAI, RELATED TO OLD CR NO.14/2014 PENDING BEFORE THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, JEEYAPURAM, TRICHY +1. CC to M/S.N.ANANTHAPADMANABAN Advocate SR.No.34743. TS/08.07.2015/2P -6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.10953 of 2015 Date :26/06/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/