Malliga v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Eighteenth day of June Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.11007 of 2015 MALLIGA ... PETITIONER/SINGLE ACCUSED Vs STATE REP By: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MELUR POLICE STATION, MELUR, MADURAI DISTRICT. CR. NO. *475 OF 2015. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.SARAVANA KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is the sole accused apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 506(i) of I.P.C., and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Charging Exorbitant Interest Act in Crime No.425 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the de-facto complainant had borrowed Rs.15,000/- from the petitioner and repaid Rs.9,000/- and thereafter, the petitioner has demanded Rs.25,000/- charging exorbitant interest and also threatened her.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that both the petitioner and the de-facto complainant are ladies and a false complaint was given against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner is innocent and she has been falsely implicated in this case
4. Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side).
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, Madurai District and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
sd/- 18/06/2015 (*Amended as per the order of this Honourable court dated.08.07.2015 and made in MP.(MD).No.1/15 in Crl.OP.(MD).No.11007/15) Time to produce sureties is extended by two weeks from the date on which the order copy is made ready.
Sd/- 08.07.2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO (to be substituted the order copy already despatched) 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MELUR 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI 3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MELUR POLICE STATION, MELUR, MADURAI DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S.S.SARAVANA KUMAR Advocate SR.No.37150 DM 24 JUNE 15 Sm:AMF:13.07.2015:2P/6C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11007 of 2015 Date :18/06/2015 2P:6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/