Veerapandi v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Eighteenth day of June Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) NoS.11027 AND 11028 of 2015 VEERAPANDI ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 IN CRL.OP(MD)NO.11027/2015 PANDI @ MUTHUKARUPPAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 IN CRL.OP(MD)NO.11028/2015 Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOTTAMPATTI POLICE STATION, MELUR TALUK, MADURAI DISTRICT, (IN CRIME NO.201 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT IN BOTH THE PETITIONS For Petitioner : M/S.DEVARAJ MAHESH Advocate in Crl.OP(MD)No.11027/2015 M/S.K.NEELAMEGAM, Advocate in Crl.OP(MD)No.11028/2015 For Respondent : M/S.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) in both the Petitions PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners A1 and A2 apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 109 and 307 of IPC, in Crime No.201 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity with regard to money dispute, the accused dashed the vehicle against the two wheeler of the de-facto complainant with an intention to turn out her life.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioners and the de-facto complainant are relatives and due to money dispute between them, the accused dashed the vehicle against the de-facto complainant and A1 is having one previous case.

5.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 7.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 18/06/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,MELUR 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOTTAMPATTI POLICE STATION, MELUR TALUK, MADURAI DISTRICT, +1. CC to M/S.DEVARAJ MAHESH Advocate SR.No.32104 +ONE CC to M/s.K.Neelamegam, Advocate, SR.No.32105 RL/7C - 22/6/2015

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) Nos.11027 and 11028 of 2015 Date :18/06/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/