Madras High CourtWP(MD)/11624/2011closed

M.A. Hameed Kannu v. The Tahsildar

2021-11-29Honourable Mr Justice M. Sundar2 pages

W.P.[MD]No.11624 of 2011 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.11.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR W.P.[MD]No.11624 of 2011 and M.P.[MD]No.1 of 2011 M.A.Hameed Kannu ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Tahsildar, Vilavancode Taluk Office, Vilavancode, Kanyakumari District.

2.M.Noorul Ameen ... Respondents P RAYER:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned notice issued by the first respondent in his proceedings No.Aa4/25200/11 dated 28.09.2011 and quash the same as illegal.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Karthik Raja for M/s.M.Ajmal Khan For Respondent No.1 : Mr.A.Baskaran Additional Government Pleader For Respondent No.2 : Mr.L.Jeen Felix for S.C.Herold Singh

O R D E R

*********** Mr.V.Karthik Raja, learned Counsel representing the Counsel on record for writ petitioner, Mr.A.Baskaran, learned Additional Government Pleader for the first respondent [official respondents] and Mr.L.Jeen Felix, learned Counsel on behalf of second respondent [private respondent] are before me.

2.Learned Counsel representing the Counsel on record for writ petitioner submits that the captioned main writ petition has become infructuous.

3.Recording the stated position of the writ petitioner, captioned writ petition is disposed of as closed the same having become infructuous. Though obvious it is made clear no opinion or https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.[MD]No.11624 of 2011 view has been expressed on the merits of the matter. Consequently, captioned Miscellaneous Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AD-II) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) MR NOTE: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To The Tahsildar, Vilavancode Taluk Office, Vilavancode, Kanyakumari District.

+1 CC to M/s.AJMAL ASSOCIATES, Advocate ( SR-36575[F] dated 30/11/2021 ) +1 CC to M/s.S.C. HEROLD SINGH, Advocate ( SR-36659[F] dated 01/12/2021 ) +1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-36519[F] dated 30/11/2021 ) ORDER MADE IN W.P.[MD]No.11624 of 2011 29.11.2021 SMV(CO) GC(07.12.2021) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2