Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/11056/2015granted

A.Sundarraj v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-06-18Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Eighteenth day of June Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.11056 of 2015 1 A.SUNDARRAJ 2 A.MADASAMY ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED No.1 & 2 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SENCOTTAH POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

CR. NO. 99 OF 2015. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.P.RAJKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.1 and 2 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 506(i) of I.P.C., and Section 4 of TNPHW Act in Crime No.99 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have not committed any offence.

3. It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) that the de-facto complainant has sustained simple injury.

4. Considering the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of their arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Shencottah and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at

10.00 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

5. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 18/06/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SHENCOTTAH.

2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SENCOTTAH POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.P.RAJKUMAR Advocate SR.No.31917

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.11056 of 2015 Date :18/06/2015 PA/KBM/23.06.2015/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/