Siva v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Sipcot

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 07/01/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Siva ... Petitioner/Accused Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, SIPCOT Police Station, Sivagangai District.

(Crime No.154/2025).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : C.Senthil Murugan, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PRAYER :- C-33 AB. For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.

154/2025 on the file of the respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- 1/6

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1) & 351(3) of BNS, 2023 (corresponding Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 326 & 506(ii)of IPC) in Crime No.154 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has hired a car for Tour from the defacto complainant, and informed him that the petitioner and 7 other persons have to travel in the car, when the defacto complainant refused the same, the petitioner along with other accused persons abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and attacked him and caused injuries. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any 2/6

conditions which may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that already anticipatory bail was granted by the trial Court, however, surety could not be executed by the petitioner and it was subsequently lapsed.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and considering the fact that already the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail by the court below, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial 3/6

Magistrate, Manamadurai, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy is made ready and on further conditions that:

[a]the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent policedaily at 10.30 a.m, until further orders;

[c]the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[d]the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions 4/6

have been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.

07.01.2026 PJL TO 1.Judicial Magistrate, Manamadurai.

2.The Inspector of Police, SIPCOT Police Station, Sivagangai District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

S.SRIMATHY,J PJL

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.208 of 2026 Date : 07/01/2026 6/6