R. Varadharaju, v. The District Collector
W.P.[MD]No.13036 of 2011 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.06.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI W.P.[MD]No.13036 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 R.Varadharaju ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The District Collector, Karur District, Karur.
2. The Tahsildar, Aravakurichi Taluk, Karur District.
3. Palraj ... Respondents (R3 - Impleaded as per vide Order dated 06.12.2013 in M.P.No.1 of 2013) P RAYER:
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 & 2 to remove the encroachments made in S.No.637 of Punnam Village, Aravakurichi Taluk, Karur District in consequently forbear the Respondent 1 & 2 from issuing Patta in favour of any individual in respect of the above property.
For Petitioner : Mr.Ponnupandi for K.Govindarajan For Respondents : Mr.Baskaran Standing Counsel for Govt, For R1 & R2.
R3 - Dismissed for default.
O R D E R
************ [Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.] Heard Mr.K.Govindarajan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Baskraran, learned Standing Counsel for the first and second respondents.
2. Due to the efflux of time, the relief sought for cannot be https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
W.P.[MD]No.13036 of 2011 granted in the Writ Petition since the Writ Petition as well as the Miscellaneous Petition as against the third respondent has been dismissed for not taking steps.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the State Government submits that the area in question has been bifurcated and it has became a Town Panchayat.
4. In the light of the same, this Writ Petition stands disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue his claim, if so advised. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AS) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) kmm Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To 1.The District Collector, Karur District,Karur.
2. The Tahsildar, Aravakurichi Taluk, Karur District.
+1 CC to M/s.K.GOVINDARAJAN, Advocate ( SR-20835[F] dated 01/07/2021 ) ORDER MADE IN W.P.[MD]No.13036 of 2011 30.06.2021 CN(14.07.2021) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2