V. Perumal v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Nineteenth day of June Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.11157 of 2015 V. PERUMAL ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No.1 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SIVAGANGAI TALUK POLICE STATION, MADURAI DT, CRIME NO. 181 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.S.MAHALINGAM Advocate For Respondent : M/S.K.V.RAJARAJAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.181 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that due to civil dispute, the petitioner is alleged to have attacked the de facto complainant with and threatened him in dire consequences.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the injured has discharged from the hospital.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital, I am inclined to grant grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sivagangai and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 19/06/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGANGAI.
2 DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGANGAI. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SIVAGANGAI TALUK POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S.S.MAHALINGAM Advocate SR.No. 32060. TS/22.06.2015/2P -6C
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.11157 of 2015 Date :19/06/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/