Subramani v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Sixth day of July Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.11173 of 2015 1 SUBRAMANI 2 DEIVENDRAN 3 SAMUNDEESWARI 4 SELVI ... PETITIONER(S) / ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs STATE REP BY:: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, DINDIGUL. CR. NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2015. ... RESPONDENT(S) / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.J.LAWRANCE Advocate For Respondent : M/s.S.PRABHA, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of I.P.C., in Crime No.not known of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side).

3.When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the de-facto complainant, enquiry was conducted and subsequently, it was closed.

4.Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), this criminal original petition is dismissed. sd/- 06/07/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, DINDIGUL. 2 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.J.LAWRANCE Advocate SR.No.36493 DM 8 7 15 2P; 4C ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11173 of 2015 Date :06/07/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/