Sudha v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Third day of February Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.1123 of 2015 SUDHA ..PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.5 Vs.

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CANTONMENT POLICE STATION, TRICHY CITY.

CR. NO.421/2013.

..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.B.JAMEEL ARASU Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 324(b), 324, 363, 506(ii) of Indian Penal Code r/w 120(b), 364, 302 and 201 of Indian Penal Code in Crime No.421 of 2013 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Heard both sides.

3. On a perusal of the final report filed in this case, it appears that the petitioner is charged for the offence punishable under 201 of Indian Penal Code, which is bailable. Hence, the petitioner is directed to, immediately, surrender before the Magistrate concerned, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a coy of this order and apply for regular bail before the said court.

4. With the above observation, this criminal original petition is closed.

sd/- 03/02/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE No.II, TRICHY.

2. -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY. 3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,CANTONMENT POLICE STATION, TRICHY CITY. +1. CC to M/S.B.JAMEEL ARASU Advocate SR.No.5024 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.1123 of 2015 Date :03/02/2015 PBK 04/02/2015 ::2P-6C:

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/