Dhanapandi v. The Commissioner Of Police
Crl.O.P.(MD).No.500 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.01.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA Crl.O.P.(MD).No.500 of 2021 Dhanapandi ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The Commissioner of Police, O/o.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City.
2.The Inspector of Police, O/o.The Inspector of Police, Thallakulam Police Station, Madurai City.
3.Bala Murugan 4.Ramakrishnan ... Respondents PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the second respondent not to interfere in the civil dispute between the petitioner and the fourth respondent.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah For R1 & R2 : Mr.A.Robinson Government Advocate (Criminal side)
O R D E R
The present petition is filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code seeking for a direction to the second respondent not to interfere in the civil dispute between him and the fourth respondent.
2.Mr.A.Robinson, learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2, would submit that no complaint was received from the fourth respondent and that the Police are not harassing the petitioner. 3.However, the main contention of the petitioner is that the fourth respondent is threatening him to vacate the premises, which was mortgaged in his favour.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
Crl.O.P.(MD).No.500 of 2021 4.In the facts and circumstances of the present case, the second respondent is directed to consider the representation dated 02.01.2021 submitted by the petitioner and also follow the guidelines issued in the decision in D.K.Basu Vs. State of West Bengal reported in AIR (1997) SC 610.
5.With the aforesaid direction, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar () // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) rmk Note :In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To 1.The Commissioner of Police, O/o.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City.
2.The Inspector of Police, O/o.The Inspector of Police, Thallakulam Police Station, Madurai City.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
Crl.O.P.(MD).No.500 of 2021 19.01.2021 VB (18.02.2021) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2