Madras High CourtWA(MD)/1256/2013dismissed as infructuous

K.M.Benedict Crizal v. The Correspondent

2021-09-03Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu,Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan2 pages

W.A(MD)No.1256 of 2013 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.09.2021 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. BHARATHIDASAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU Writ Appeal(MD)No.1256 of 2013 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2013 K.M.Benedict Crizal ... Appellant/Writ Petitioner vs.

1)The Correspondent, St.Joseph's Higher Secondary School, Vizhunthayambalam, Kanyakumari District.

2)Rev.Fr.G.Maria Gladson Enquiry Officer C/o Correspondent, St.Joseph's Higher Secondary School, Vizhunthayambalam, Kanyakumari District.

... Respondents/Respondents Appeal filed under Clause 15of the Letters Patent, to set aside the order dated 26.09.2013 in Writ Petition(MD)No.15435 of 2012 and allow the Writ petition as prayed for.

Prayer in WP(MD). 15435/ 2012 :

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned letters dated 28.01.2010, 12.10.2012 and 17.11.2012 issued by the 1st respondent herein, Quah the same, and further Direct the 1st respondent herein disburse the subsistence allowance/back wages to the petitioner and to conduct enquiry by appointing impartial enquiry officer.

For Appellant : Mr.E.V.N.Siva For R1 : Mr.D.Nallathambi For R2 : No appearance https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.A(MD)No.1256 of 2013

JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was made by V. BHARATHIDASAN, J.) The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous and nothing remains in this appeal for adjudication.

2.Recording the said submission, this Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AS) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) bala Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

W.A(MD)No.1256 of 2013 DATED : 03.09.2021 KMK(CO) KB(23.09.2021) 2P 1C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2