Madras High CourtWP(MD)/772/2020dismissed

Ramar v. The Chairman

2020-09-01Honourable Mr Justice M. Sathyanarayanan,Honourable Mr Justice P. Rajamanickam2 pages

W.P.(MD)No.772 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.09.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM W.P.(MD)No.772 of 2020 Ramar ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Chairman, State Level Scrutiny Committee II, Additional Secretary to Government, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare(CV3) Department, Secretariat, Chennai.

2.The Chairman District Level Scrutiny Committee cum District Collector, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare (CV3) Department, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

3.The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

4.The Tahsildar, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District.

... Respondents Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to pass final orders in the appeal filed by the petitioner dated 24.02.2016 by acting upon the proceedings of the first respondent in his proceedings in Letter No.790/CVIII/2019-1, dated 30.07.2019 and pass order on merits and in accordance with law within the stipulated period.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jerin Mathew For Respondents : Mr.K.P.Krishnadoss Special Government Pleader

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by M.SATHYANARAYANAN,J.) The matter in issue pertains to the non-issuance of the Hindu Scheduled Tribes Malaivedan Community certificate in favour of the four children of the writ petitioner.

2. The learned Special Government Pleader today submitted the proceedings of the Dindigul District Scrutiny Committee, dated https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD)No.772 of 2020 25.02.2020, in and by which, a request made in this regard came to be rejected and also served upon the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, who prays for liberty to challenge the said proceedings in accordance with law.

3. The proceedings of the Dindigul District Scrutiny Committee, dated 25.02.2020, are taken on file and record.

4. In the light of the said development, nothing remains for further adjudication in this writ petition and therefore, it is dismissed as infructuous. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the proceedings of the Dindigul District Scrutiny Committee, dated 25.02.2020 in accordance with law, before the competent Forum. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl.Side) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Note:In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned To 1.The Chairman, State Level Scrutiny Committee II, Additional Secretary to Government, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare(CV3) Department, Secretariat, Chennai.

2.The Chairman District Level Scrutiny Committee cum District Collector, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare (CV3) Department, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

3.The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

4.The Tahsildar, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District.

+1 CC to M/s.Special Govt.Pleader ( SR-15683[F] dated 02/09/2020 ) W.P.(MD)No.772 of 2020 01.09.2020 SSL SDS (08.09.2020) 2P-6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2