Madras High CourtWA(MD)/436/2013dismissed as infructuous

The Superintending Engineer, v. M/S.Harihar Alloys Private

2019-12-16Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mr Justice Subramonium Prasad2 pages

W.A(MD)No.436 of 2013 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.12.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.P.SAHI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD W.A.[MD]No.436 of 2013 and M.P.[MD]No.1 of 2013 The Superintending Engineer, Pudukottai Electricity Distribution Circle, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Pudukottai.

: Appellant/Respondent 1 Vs.

1.M/s.Harihar Alloys Private Limited represented by its Director, represented Office at 1/43, Race Course Road, Kajamalai, Trichy. : Respondent 1/Petitioner 2.Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission, Rukmani Lakshmipathi Road, Egmore, Chennai.

: Respondent 2/Respondents No.2 PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, against the order dated 12.03.2013 passed in W.P.No.14627 of 2010 by a learned Single Judge of this Court Prayer in WP(MD). 14627/ 2010 :

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court It is prayed a writ of certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the 1st Respondent culminating in the CC Bill of the Petitioner dated 28.11.2010 for the month of November, 2010, for HT SC No.121 in so far as it relates to charges for reliability / additional power and quash the same and further direct the 1st respondent not to charge the petitioner for additional reliability power without following the procedure set out in M.P.No.21 of 2010 dated 05.01.2010 of the 2nd respondent.

For Appellant : Mr.S.M.S.Johny Basha For Respondent No. 1 : Mr.S.Suresh https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ For Respondent No.2 : No appearance

W.A(MD)No.436 of 2013

JUDGMENT

************** [Judgment of the Court was delivered by The Hon'ble Chief Justice] Learned Counsel for the appellant/Superintending Engineer states that the matter has been settled between the parties and therefore, the writ appeal no longer survives for any further adjudication.

2.The Writ Appeal is, accordingly, consigned to records. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Records) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Arul/GCG +1 CC to Mrs.M.S.JOHNNY BASHA, Advocate ( SR-105510[F] dated 18/12/2019 ) +1 CC to Mr.A.SARAVANAKUMAR, Advocate ( SR-105675[F] dated 18/12/2019 ) JUDGMENT MADE IN W.A.[MD]No.436 of 2013 16.12.2019 VB(07.01.2020) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/