← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/1273/2022dismissed

I.Melda v. The Inspector Of Police

2024-01-31Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 31.01.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Crl.O.P.(MD) No.1273 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.(MD).Nos.922 & 923 of 2022 1.Melda 2.N.Ines Stanly Babu 3.E.Nalla Thambi ... Petitioners Vs.

1.The State through the Inspector of Police, Medical College Police Station, Tirunelveli City.

2.C.Balachandran

...Respondents

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the records in connection with the impugned charge sheet in C.C.No.506 of 2021 pending on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tirunelveli and quash the same. For petitioners : Ms.M.Anbarasi For R-1 : Mr.S.Manikandan Government Advocate (Criminal Side) 1/6

O RDER This petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.506 of 2021 pending on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tirunelveli.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to civil dispute between the petitioners and the second respondent / defacto complainant's family, the petitioners herein abused the second respondent in filthy language and attacked him and escaped from that place. Hence, the second respondent made a complaint before the first respondent Police and the first respondent Police registered a case in Crime No.465 of 2020 against the petitioners and the respondent Police conducted the investigation and on completion of investigation, the charge sheet has been filed before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tirunelveli and the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate has taken cognizance in C.C.No.506 of 2021 for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324, 355 and 506 (ii) of I.P.C.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that a false case has been foisted against the petitioners and there is no specific allegation made against the petitioners. 2/6

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that there are materials available to proceed with the case as against the petitioners herein and at the threshold, the criminal proceedings cannot be quashed and the charges against the petitioners have to be gone into only at the time of trial and hence, he prayed for dismissal of the petition.

5. In the above circumstances, the trial court has rightly taken the case on file and this Court is of the considered view that no prejudice would be caused to the petitioners, if they are subjected to due trial as sufficient opportunity would be given to the petitioners to put forth their defence. The petitioners cannot be let by quashing the charges framed against them as that would completely undermine the alleged act, which is the subject matter of criminal trial pending against them. Useful reference in this regard can be made to the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in State of Haryana - Vs - Bhajan Lal (1992 SCC (Crl.) 426)

6. For the reasons aforesaid, this Court finds no ground or scope to quash C.C.No.506 of 2021, pending on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tirunelveli. Accordingly, this Criminal 3/6

Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

7. At this juncture, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that this Court may consider to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioners before the court below. Taking into consideration the request as made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the appearance of the petitioners before the trial court is dispensed with except for their appearance for the purpose of receiving the copy of the proceedings u/s 207 Cr.P.C., framing of charges, questioning under Section 313 Cr.P.C. and on the day on which judgment is to be pronounced. However, if for any particular reason, the presence of the petitioners is necessary, the trial court, at its wisdom, shall direct their appearance on those days.

31.01.2024 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No TSG 4/6

To 1.The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tirunelveli.. 2.The Inspector of Police, Medical College Police Station, Tirunelveli City.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

M.DHANDAPANI. J.

TSG 31.01.2024 6/6