← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/10060/2013closed

K.Krishnan v. The Authorized Officer,

2022-09-05Honourable Mr Justice R.Vijayakumar4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.09.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR and M.P(MD)Nos.2 and 3 of 2013 K.Krishnan, : Petitioner Vs

1. The Authorized Officer, State Bank of India, Pudukottai Branch, Pudukottai District.

2. State Bank of India, Rep by its Branch Manager, Ponnamaravathi Branch, Ponnamaravathi, Pudukottai District.

: Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the file of the first respondent pertaining to its notice dated 14.06.2013 published in Dina thanthi on 14- 06.2013 with regard to the tractor at SI. No. 1 of the notice bearing Reg.No. TN 63 F 7368 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to hand over the tractor to the petitioner.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh For Respondents : Mr.M.Ponnaih

O R D E R

************* The present Writ Petition had been filed challenging the auction cum tender notice issued by the first respondent Bank to bring the tractor belongs to the petitioner for auction on the ground of default-in-payment of monthly instalments.

2.On a perusal of records, it is seen that an order of interim stay was granted by this Court on 24.06.2013, directing the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.1,25,000/- to the second respondent Bank, within a period of four weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of that order. As per the said interim order, if the said amount is not paid, the interim stay granted shall stand vacated automatically without further reference to the Court. The petitioner was not able to deposit the said amount. The interim stay got vacated automatically. Hence, the first respondent Bank proceeded with the auction, sold the tractor in dispute and credited the amount to the loan account of the petitioner.

3.According to the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent Bank, still there are dues pending from the petitioner and the loan account has not been closed.

4.The prayer sought for in this writ petition is only to quash the auction notice and to direct the Bank to hand over the tractor. In view of vacation of the interim stay, the respondent Bank had already auctioned the Tractor and the same was sold to a third party. Therefore, nothing survives in this writ petition and the same is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 05.09.2022 (1/2) Index:Yes/No lr To

R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

lr ORDER MADE IN 05.09.2022 (1/2)