← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/2868/2011dismissed for nonprosecution

B. Ravi, S/O.Balusamy, v. The Tamil Nadu Electricity

2020-11-10Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose2 pages

W.P.(MD)No.2868 of 2011 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.11.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.(MD)No.2868 of 2011 B.Ravi ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Represented by its Chairman, No.800, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002.

2.The Superintending Engineer, Madurai Electricity Distribution Circle, K.Pudur, Madurai-625 007.

3.The Assistant Electrical Engineer, Tamil Sangam Division, Perunagar, Madurai-625 001.

... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the third respondent's proceedings in K.No.UMPO/V/TS/N.V./KO.Kattu/A.No.46/2011, dated 28.02.2011, quash the same and consequently, directing the third respondent to receive the petitioner's electricity service connection application and to provide electricity service connection to the housing plot No.52, comprised in T.S.No.1208/22/2A, situated in Raja Mill Road, Madurai Town, within the time framed fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Ms.M.Rajeswari For S.M.S.Johny Basha Standing Counsel

ORDER

Today, the matter is listed under the caption "For Dismissal". There was no representation on the side of the petitioner on the last hearing date i.e., on 29.10.2020. Today also, there is no representation on the side of the petitioner. It can now be inferred that the writ petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this Writ Petition.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD)No.2868 of 2011 2.Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (co) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Tsg Note:In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate/litigant concerned. order made in W.P.(MD)No.2868 of 2011 10.11.2020 VB (27.11.2020) 2P 1C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2