Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/11470/2015ordered

Dhilipanraj v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-06-24Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Fourth day of June Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.11470 of 2015 1 DHILIPANRAJ 2 MARX ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 AND 2 Vs STATE REP BY:: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NADUCAVERY POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DIST.

CR.NO. 36 OF 2015. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.P.RAJKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : P. KANNNITHEVAN, GOVT ADV. (CRL SIDE) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b),323 and 506(ii) I.P.C in Crime No.36 of 2015 and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution that there was wordy quarrel due to which the petitioners attacked the defacto complainant with hands and abused him with filthy language and threatened with dire consequences.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocents and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the injured had already been discharged from hospital.

5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the State and also perused the entire materials available on record.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned (*)Judicial Magistrate,Thiruvaiyaru, and on each of them executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction to the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 24/06/2015 (*)AMENDED AS PER THE ORDER OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT DATED 16/7/2015 AND MADE IN MP(MD).1/15 IN CRL.OP(MD)NO.11470/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO (*)1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUVAIYARU 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR AT KUMBAKONAM THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR 4 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR \ MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NADUCAVERY POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DIST.

+1. CC to M/S.P.RAJKUMAR Advocate SR.No.33654 DM 24 JUNE 15 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.11470 of 2015 Date :24/06/2015 RL/2P:7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/