Yaseer @ Yaseer v. The Inspector Of Police

Crl.O.P.(MD).No.562 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.01.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.(MD).No.562 of 2020 Yaseer @ Yaseer Ali ..Petitioner/Accused No.2 Vs.

1.State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Eral Police Station, Eral, Thoothukkudi District.

(Crime No.70 of 2014) ...1st Respondent/Complainant 2.Jailani @ Syed Mohammed Jailani ...2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records pertaining to the case in Crime No.70 of 2014 on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Arun For R1 : Mrs.S.Bharathi Government Advocate (Crl. side) For R2 : Mr.A.Aathiyan

O R D E R

The Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.70 of 2014 on the file of the first respondent police, for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 294(b) and 323 of IPC.

2.The case is still at the stage of investigation. By passage of time, the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably among themselves. 3.A Joint Memo of Compromise has been filed before this Court, which have been signed by the petitioner and the second respondent and also by their respective counsel. The petitioner and the second respondent were also present in person before this Court and they were identified by Mr.P.Nellaiappan, SSI of Police. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD).No.562 of 2020 4.Under such circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the First Information Report pending, even though, the offences involved are not compoundable in nature. In the light of the guidelines given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2017 9 SCC 641-(Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath), this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashes the First Information Report in Crime No.70 of 2014.

5.It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner paid a sum of Rs.3000/-(Rupees Three thousand only) as costs to the Credit of the Chief Justice Relief Fund, Madurai Bench of Madrash High Court, Madurai and filed the original cash receipt along with this memo on 27.01.2020. The said submission is placed on record. 6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and as a sequel, the proceedings in Crime No.70 of 2014, on the file of the first respondent police, is quashed and the terms of joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of this order.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Encl:Xerox copy of Joint compromise memo vsg To 1.The Inspector of Police, Eral Police Station, Eral, Thoothukkudi District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P.(MD).No.562 of 2020 27.01.2020 KM/(10.02.2020) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2