Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/11619/2015allowed

Leela v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

2015-06-25Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Fifth day of June Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.11619 of 2015 1 LEELA 2 SIJA ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Vs STATE THROUGH THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUVATTAR POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

CR. NO. 378/2015. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.KR.SINGARAVADIVEL Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners who are arrayed as accused apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, and 506(i) of IPC in Crime No.378 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to civil dispute, the petitioners attacked the de facto complainant and abused him in filthy language.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that it is a simple injury and the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the

learned Judicial Magistrate, Pathmanathapuram and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 25/06/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PATHMANATHAPURAM.

2 -DO-THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI AT NAGERCOIL.

3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUVATTAR POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.KR.SINGARAVADIVEL Advocate SR.No.33670 akm/26.06.15 /2p-6c/

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.11619 of 2015 Date :25/06/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/