Singam @ Vetriselvan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Fifth day of June Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.11640 of 2015 1 SINGAM @ VETRISELVAN 2 THANGAPANDIAN 3 KAMAL ... PETITIONER(S) / ACCUSED 4 - 6 Vs STATE REP BY:: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE GANESH NAGAR POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT. CR. NO. 125 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.G.MATHAVAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A4 to A6 in Crime No.125 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 07.04.2015 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 302 of I.P.C., and hence, seek bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the brother of the first accused was done to death by the deceased and in order to take vengeance, the accused attacked the deceased with arival and caused his death.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the accused 2 and 3 are the parents of the first accused and the petitioners are friends of the first accused and the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and that the petitioners are innocent persons and the petitioners are languishing in jail for more than 79 days.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) opposed the bail petition stating that it is a case of retaliation murder and still tensed situation is prevailing. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) further submitted that major part of investigation is over.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on each of them executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pudukkottai, and on further condition that the petitioners shall stay at Dindigul District and appear before Dindigul Town Police Station daily twice at 10.00 a.m and 5.00 p.m until further orders. sd/- 25/06/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PUDUKKOTTAI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PUDUKKOTTAI 3 THE THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE GANESH NAGAR POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT. 5 THE OFFICER IN CHARGE DISTRICT PRISON, PUDUKKOTTAI +1. CC to M/S.G.MATHAVAN Advocate SR.No.33811 DM 24 JUNE 15

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.11640 of 2015 Date :25/06/2015 2P:7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/