← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/5465/2011closed

Nn 566 Oyikottai Primary v. The Assistant Provident Fund

2021-03-25Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

W.P.(MD)Nos.5465 and 5466 of 2011 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.03.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.(MD)Nos.5465 and 5466 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1, 1 and 2 of 2011 NN 566 Oyikottai Primary Agricultural Co-operative Bank, Rep. through its Secretary, Oyikottai Post, Thiruvadanai, Ramanathapuram.

... Petitioner in both W.Ps.

versus

1. The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Employees Provident Fund Organization Sub-Regional Office, Madurai - 2.

2. The Recovery Officer, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Sub-Regional Office, Madurai - 2.

...Respondents in both W.Ps.

Prayer in W.P.(MD)No.5465 of 2011: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the order passed by the respondent in No. TN/MDU/24858/Enf/Circle 15/15092/2011 dated 07.02.2011 and the consequential order in TN/MDU/24858/Recy 2011068/Circle 15/2011 dated 31.03.2011 and quash the same. Prayer in W.P.(MD)No.5466 of 2011: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the order passed by the respondent in No. TN/MDU/24858/Enf/Circle15/15020/2008 dated 11.09.2008 and the consequential order in M5/TN/MDU/24858/RECY/RO/2011 dated 21.02.2011 and quash the same. (in both WP's) For Petitioner : Mr.V.O.S.Kalaiselvam For Respondents : Mr.K.Murali Sankar Standing Counsel https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD)Nos.5465 and 5466 of 2011 COMMON ORDER Today, when the matters are taken up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that since the petitioner has remitted the amount, the prayer sought for in the writ petitions have become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, these writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(P & A) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) ogy To

1. The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Employees Provident Fund Organization Sub-Regional Office, Madurai - 2.

2. The Recovery Officer, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Sub-Regional Office, Madurai - 2.

+2 CC to M/s.K.MURALISANKAR, Advocate ( SR-13843, 13850[F] dated 26/03/2021 ) W.P.(MD)Nos.5465 and 5466 of 2011 25.03.2021 NA(CO) TR(03.05.2021) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2