Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/11713/2015disposed of

Sekar v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-06-24Honourable Mr Justice M.M.Sundresh2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED 24.06.2015

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH Crl.O.P(MD).Nos.11713 & 11714 of 2015 Crl.O.P(MD)No.11713 of 2015 1.Sekar 2.Rajendran 3.Moorthy ..Petitioners in Crl.O.P(MD)No.11713 of 2015 -Vs.

1.State By The Inspector of Police, Palani Town Police Station, Dindigul District.

2.Pradeep Jabhastian ...2nd Respondent/Defacto-Complainant Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to call for the records pertaining to Crime No.518 of 2015 dated 01.06.2015 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same. For Petitioners :

Mr.D.Venkatesh For Respondents :

Mrs.S.Prabha Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 Mr.T.Dhandapani for R2 Crl.O.P(MD)No.11714 of 2015 Pradeep Jabhastian ..Petitioner/Sole accused in Crl.O.P(MD)No.11714 of 2015 -Vs.

1.State By The Inspector of Police, Palani Town Police Station, Dindigul District.

...1st Respondent/Complainant 2.Moorthy ...2nd Respondent/Defacto-Complainant Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to call for the records pertaining to Crime No.517 of 2015 dated 01.06.2015 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner :

Mr.T.Lenin Kumar For Respondents :

Mrs.S.Prabha Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Mr.P.Chellapandian for R2

COMMON ORDER The petitioners in Crl.O.P(MD)No.11713 of 2015 are arrayed as A1 to A3 in Crime No.518 of 2015 for the offences under Sections 294(b), 323, 506(i) and 379 (NP) IPC, which is pending on the file of the first respondent police. Similarly, the petitioner in Crl.O.P(MD)No.11714 of 2015, is an accused in Crime No.517 of 2015 for the offences under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) IPC. It is a case of case a counter.

2. When the matters are taken up for hearing, two joint memo of compromise have been field by the parties and countersigned by them to the effect that both FIRs may be quashed. The parties are also present before this Court along with their respective Counsels.

3. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondents.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and after going through the records as well as joint compromise memos, this Court is inclined to quash the proceedings in F.I.R.Nos.518 of 2015 and 517 of 2015 respectively are quashed against the petitioners and these Criminal Original Petitions are allowed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Per Admn) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Inspector of Police, Palani Town Police Station, Dindigul District. 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to MR.D.VENKATESH, Advocate in SR.No. 33743 Gsr SR/SJW : 09.07.2015 : 2p/4c Crl.O.P(MD).Nos.11713 & 11714 of 2015 24.06.2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/