← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/618/2022granted

Bharathiraja v. The Inspector Of Police

2022-02-01Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 01/02/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN CRL OP(MD). No.618 of 2022

1. Bharathiraja

2. Senthil Kumar

3. Chellamal ... Petitioners/Accused Vs State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Vattathikottai Police Station, Thanjavur District.

(Crime No.517/2021).

... Respondent For Petitioners: M/s.K.Pragadeesh Kumar, Advocate. For Respondent : M/s.S.Manikandan, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.517/2021 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 352, 427, 448, 506(2) IPC, in Crime No.517 of 2021, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that there was land dispute between the parties, the accused persons alleged to have abused, assaulted the defacto complainant party and also threatened with dire consequences. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that it is a case in counter, based upon the complaint given by the petitioners, the counter case was registered in Crime No.466 of 2021 against the defacto complainant party and that no one injured in the occurrence. Hence, prays to release them on anticipatory bail. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that based upon the complaint given by the petitioner, case in counter was registered in Cr.No.466 of 2021 against the defacto complainant party and in both the cases no one injured in the occurrence.

5.Considering the land dispute between the parties, that no one is injured in the occurrence, that the petitioners are not having any previous case at their credit and it is a case in counter, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or their appearance, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pattukottai and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am for a period of one month and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

Sd/- 01/02/2022 / TRUE COPY / / /2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.I) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

PNM Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PATTUKOTTAI.

2. -DO- THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR DISTRICT AT KUMBAKONAM.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VATTATHIKOTTAI POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.618 of 2022 Date :01/02/2022 SP/JM/SAR I/09/02/2022/3P/5C