Manonmani Ramar v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Dcb
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 08/01/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Manonmani Ramar ... Petitioner/Accused Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, DCB, Police Station, Theni District.
Crime No.11/2025.
... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : P.Senguttuarasan, Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PRAYER :- C-24AB.For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.11/2025 on the file of the respondent police ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the 1/6
hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 417, 419, 420, 468, 471, 120 B of IPC, in Crime No.11 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused persons have cheated the defacto complainant and his aunt and using forged documents alienated 78 cents of land and also removed valuable household articles from the defacto complainant's aunt's house. Thus, the petitioner has committed serious offence of cheating, forgery, impersonation and criminal conspiracy and caused loss to the defcato complainant. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court. 2/6
Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that A3 was already arrested and released on bail. The petitioner is the wife of A3. However, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and since the co-accused already arrested and released on bail, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.
6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Theni, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy is made ready 3/6
and on further conditions that:
[a]the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity;
[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police on all Saturdays and Sundays at 10.30 a.m, for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;
[c]the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
[d]the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
[e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in 4/6
accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];
[f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.
08.01.2026 PJL TO
1. Judicial Magistrate, Theni.
2.The Inspector of Police, DCB, Police Station, Theni District.
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
5/6
S.SRIMATHY,J PJL
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.306 of 2026 Date : 08/01/2026 6/6