← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/16340/2012disposed of

B.Sasi, v. The Principal Secretary To

2019-08-02Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam2 pages

W.P.[MD]No.16340 & 16341/2012 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.08.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P[MD]Nos.16340 & 16341 of 2012 and M.P.[MD]Nos.2, 2, 3 & 3 of 2012 B.Sasi : Petitioner in W.P.[MD]No.16340/12 C.Manimozhi : Petitioner in W.P.[MD]No.16341/12 Vs.

1.The Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

2.The Principal Secretary and Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

3.The District Collector, Collectorate, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

: Respondents in both Writ Petitions COMMON PRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writs of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned revised list of Deputy Tahsildar, Dindigul District for the year 2009 in A1/16231/2009 (DT 2009) dated 11.10.2012 and the revised list of Deputy Tahsildar for Dindigul District for the year 2011 in A1/16231/2009 (DT 2011) dated 11.10.2012 on the file of the third respondent and quash the same as illegal to the extent of deleting the name of the petitioner from the list of Deputy Tahsildar for the year 2009 and placing the petitioner in the Revised List of Deputy Tahsildar for the year 2011 and consequently to direct the third respondent to redraw the Revised List of Deputy Tahsildar for Dindigul District by including the petitioner in the List of Deputy Tahsildar for the year 2009 within the time stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioners : Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy For Respondents : Mr.S.Dhayalan Government Advocate [In both Writ Petitions] https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.[MD]No.16340 & 16341/2012 COMMON ORDER The learned Counsel for the writ petitioners made a submission that the issues in relation to the promotion to the post of Deputy Tahsildar was adjudicated by the Supreme Court of India and a judgment was delivered in favour of the writ petitioners. Accordingly, the benefit of the judgment of the Supreme Court is extended to the officials concerned.

2.In view of the fact that the issues had already been decided by the Apex Court and settled, no further adjudication is required and the case of the writ petitioners are also to be considered with reference to the orders passed by the Apex Court. 3.With these observations, the writ petitions stand disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (P&A) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS ) To 1.The Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

2.The Principal Secretary and Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

3.The District Collector, Collectorate, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

+2 CC to M/s.T.LAJAPATHI ROY, Advocate SR-79628, 79629 +1 CC to SPL GP ( SR-79754[F] dated 05/08/2019 ) W.P.[MD]Nos.16340 & 16341 of 2012 02.08.2019 mr MK (22.10.2019) 2P 7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2