← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/9674/2011disposed of

K.Chandrasekar v. Tamilnadu Electricity

2021-01-18Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan2 pages

WP(MD)No.9674 of 2011 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.01.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN WP(MD)No.9674 of 2011 and MP(MD)Nos.1 & 2 of 2011 & 1 of 2013 K.Chandrasekar ... Petitioner Vs.

1.Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission, No.17, 3rd Main Road, Seethammal Colony, Alwarpet, Chennai - 600 028.

2.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, 800, Anna Salai, Chennai.

3.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Operation and Maintenance, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, TANGEDCO, Chinthamanipatty, Karur District.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to Letter No.AEE/O&M/CMPT/CI/F.THEFT/D.No. 245/2011 dated 12.08.2011 issued by the 3rd respondent and quash the same and consequently directing the 3rd respondent herein to restore the Agriculture Power Supply to the Electricity Service Connection No.233, Tariff IV, Thalivasal Distribution, Thalivasal, Palaviduthi West and pass any such further or other orders as this Hon ble Court may deem fit.

For Petitioner :

Mr.V.Ramajegadeesan For Respondents :

Ms.Parameshwari for Mr.SMS Johnny Basha

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.What is under challenge is only an order of provisional assessment. In the impugned communication dated 12.08.2011, it has been clearly stated that if the petitioner is desirous of filing objections, he can do so. Without doing so, the petitioner rushed to this Court. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to lodge his objections within a https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/4

WP(MD)No.9674 of 2011 period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. On receipt of objections from the petitioner, the respondent can proceed as per law. If the petitioner fails to lodge any objection within the aforesaid period, it is open to the respondents to take action as per law. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. The contentions of the petitioner are left open. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl.Side) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) skm Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To 1.The Secretary,Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission, No.17, 3rd Main Road, Seethammal Colony, Alwarpet, Chennai - 600 028.

2.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, 800, Anna Salai, Chennai.

3.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Operation and Maintenance, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, TANGEDCO, Chinthamanipatty, Karur District.

+1 CC to M/s.D.SRINIVASARAGHAVAN, Advocate ( SR-1337[F] dated 20/01/2021 ) WP(MD)No.9674 of 2011 and MP(MD)Nos.1 & 2 of 2011 & 1 of 2013 18.01.2021 (SSS)CO AP(03/02/2021) 2 P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/4