Madras High CourtWP(MD)/9944/2011closed

D. Runstyed v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

2022-04-08Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi2 pages

Cont.P(MD)No.1282 of 2017 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.04.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI W.P.(MD)No.9944 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 D.Runstyed ... Petitioner versus

1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District.

2. The Tahsildar, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

3. Jainvel ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of writ of certiorari, to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the order in Na.Ka.No.A1/3182/2011 dated 25.07.2011 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Prabu Rajadurai For R1 and R2 : Mr.N.Ramesh Arumugam Government Advocate For R3 : No such addressee

ORDER

This writ petition is filed as against the notice issued by the first respondent dated 25.07.2011.

2. Based on the petition filed by the third respondent, the first respondent issued the impugned notice, calling upon the petitioner to offer his explanation for change of patta as requested by the third respondent. Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner succeeded in the civil suit in O.S.No.416 of 2019 and obtained decree in his favour. But, the first respondent, without considering the same, issued the impugned notice.

4. The learned Government Advocate submits that the civil suit went upto the High Court by way of filing second appeal in S.A.(MD) No.1083 of 2011 and pending the second appeal, the third respondent and the petitioner have arrived at a compromise and on 23.01.2014, the third respondent has released the subject matter of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Cont.P(MD)No.1282 of 2017 property in favour of the petitioner and now, the property is vested with the petitioner. Therefore, nothing survives in this writ petition.

5. Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (T&P) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) ogy To

1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District.

2. The Tahsildar, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

+1 CC to M/s.G. PRABHU RAJADURAI, Advocate ( SR-17746[F] dated 11/04/2022 ) +1 CC to M/s.SPL.GP ( SR-17877[F] dated 11/04/2022 ) W.P.(MD)No.9944 of 2011 08.04.2022 MGJ(27.04.2022) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2