Arjun, v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Thirtieth day of June Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.12031 of 2015 1 ARJUN 2 RAJAPANDIAN 3 ALAGURAJA 4 SAKTHIVEL 5 MUTHUMANI 6 UDHAYAKUMAR ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANK A2 TO A7 KNOWN Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NILAKOTTAI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DT.

CRIME NO.241/2015 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.K.MANIKANDAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(B), 323, 427 and 506(ii) of I.P.C. in Crime No.241 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 24.06.2015, the petitioners went to the de-facto complainant's shop, and attacked him and also damaged the articles.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. 5.Considering facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6.. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Nilakottai and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 30/06/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, NILAKKOTTAI.

2 DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NILAKOTTAI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DT.

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.K.MANIKANDAN Advocate SR.No.34953

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.12031 of 2015 Date :30/06/2015 PA/IV/01.07.2015/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/