V.Senthmil Sekar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the First day of July Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.12063 of 2015 V.SENTHMIL SEKAR ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED Vs state rep by THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TIRUCHENDUR TALUK POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DIST. (CRIME NO. 20 OF 2014) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.A.P.MUTHU PANDIAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police in pursuance of the Non Bailable Warrant issued in P.R.C.No.

50 of 2014 for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 342, 506 (ii) IPC and Section 3(1) of TNPPDL Act on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tiruchendur, and hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was unaware of filing of charge sheet and therefore, the petitioner could not appear before the court on 19.06.2015 and hence, the learned Magistrate has issued Non Bailable Warrant against the petitioner. The learned counsel further submitted that he is ready to appear for all future hearings.

3.Heard the learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) appearing for the State.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tiruchendur, and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the said court on all hearings. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

5. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 01/07/2015 / TRUE COPY / https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUCHENDUR 2 -DO-THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TUTICORIN 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TIRUCHENDUR TALUK POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DIST.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.A.P.MUTHU PANDIAN Advocate SR.No.35214 Sm:AMF:07.07.2015:2P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.12063 of 2015 Date :01/07/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/