← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/12127/2015ordered

Kannan v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

2015-07-03Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Third day of July Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.12127 of 2015 KANNAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.6 Vs STATE REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE TIRUNELVELI MEDICAL COLLEGE POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DT.

CRIME NO.85 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.R.ALAGUMANI Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as A6, in Crime No.85 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 28.05.2015 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 466, 468, 471, 473, 474, 476, 420, 120(b) and 419 of I.P.C., and hence, seeks bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the accused issued identity card to the physically challenged persons, who are not eligible under physically challenged category and also forged the signature of the Doctors.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent persona and he has been falsely implicated in this case and the petitioner is a physically challenged person and the employment will be given to the physically challenged persons, after the medical board issued a certificate and the certificate issued by A1, which is not in a way to helpful the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the petitioner is a beneficiary and he is not a disabled person and A1 to A4 created bogus disability certificates and issued to A5 to get an employment in Government. He further submitted that the petitioner has no bad antecedents.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the petitioner has no previous case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail on the following conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli and on further condition https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.

sd/- 03/07/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, TIRUNELVELI.

2 DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

3 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON,PALAYAMKOTTAI AT TIRUNELVELI.

4 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE TIRUNELVELI MEDICAL COLLEGE POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DT.

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.R.ALAGUMANI Advocate SR.No.35990

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.12127 of 2015 Date :03/07/2015 PA/PRV/03.07.2015/2P/7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/