M.Seerengan v. The Superintendent Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :31.08.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.728 of 2020 1.M.Seerengan 2.Kanniyammal 3.Thiruppathi ... Petitioners Vs.
1.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District, Trichy.
2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Manaparai, Trichy District.
3.The Inspector of Police, Vaiyampatti Police Station, Trichy District.
4.The Sub Inspector of Police, Vaiyampatti Police Station, Vaiyampatti, Trichy District.
5.Shanmuga Sundaram 6.Balasubramani 7.Ramasamy ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the second respondent herein to provide necessary police protection to the life and limb of the petitioners and to the property sitauted in Tiruchirapalli District, Manapparai Taluk, Vaiyamalaipalayam Village S.F.No.70/1 land measuring 0.55 cents out of acre 1.63 cents corresponding to 0.66.0 Hectre bounded by common pathway on west, Nagaraj land on east, land purchased by the seventh respondent and that east west road on north.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Senthil Kumar For Respondents : Mr.K.SANJAI GANDHI For R1 to R4 Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
This petition has been filed to direct the second respondent herein to provide necessary police protection to the life and limb of the petitioners and to the property sitauted in Tiruchirapalli District, Manapparai Taluk, Vaiyamalaipalayam Village S.F.No.70/1 land measuring 0.55 cents out of acre 1.63 cents corresponding to 0.66.0 Hectre bounded by common pathway on west, Nagaraj land on east, land purchased by the seventh respondent and that east west road on north.
2.When the matter is came up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that based upon the representation made by the petitioners, enquiry was undertaken. During the course of enquiry, both the parties have given a statement that the civil suits are pending and they are ready to obey the judgment. In the mean time, they will not make any trouble with each other. Based upon the above undertaking, the complaint has been closed on 01.03.2020.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the A.S.No.11 of 2019 the Sub-Court, Manapari and the appeal filed by the private respondents was dismissed.
4.Since the representation given by the petitioner was closed by the fourth respondent, nothing survives for further consideration or direction in this matter. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner may give a proper representation, if any trouble is exist even after the above said undertaking and disposal of the appeal, by stating proper facts and necessity of the police protection to the concerned respondent police. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AS) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) tta NOTE: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District, Trichy.
2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Manaparai, Trichy District.
3.The Inspector of Police, Vaiyampatti Police Station, Trichy District.
4.The Sub Inspector of Police, Vaiyampatti Police Station, Vaiyampatti, Trichy District.
5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
+1 CC to M/s.R.SENTHILKUMAR, Advocate (SR-27839[F] dated 01/09/2021) Crl.O.P.(MD)No.728 of 2020 31.08.2021 DJ(CO) SB(05.10.2021) 3P 7C