Balasubramani v. The District Collector

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.02.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER Balasubramani ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Karur District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kulithala Taluk, Karur District.

3.The Tahsildar, Kulithala Taluk, Karur District.

4.The Sub Inspector of Surveyor, Kulithala Taluk, Karur District.

5.The Sub Inspector, Thogamalai Police Station, Karur District.

6.Natarajan ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to remove the stone put up by the fourth respondent on basis of the application given Page No. 1 of 5

by the sixth respondent without considering the objection given by the petitioner to the respondents dated 10.12.2025 in S.No.547/6A-0.47 cents 547/6C-0.49 cents, 548/1C-0.52 cents, 548/1F-0.30 cents, 548/1A-0.3 cents of Poovayeepatty, Vadaseri Post, Kulithala Taluk, Karur District. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian For R1 to R4 : Mr.B.Ramanathan Additional Government Pleader For R5 : Mr.S.Prakash Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For R6 : Mr.V.G.Vallarasu Chezhiyan *****

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to remove the boundary stone erected by the fourth respondent on the basis of the application submitted by the sixth respondent, without considering the petitioner's objections dated 10.12.2025, in respect of the lands situated in Survey Nos.547/6A (0.47 cents), 547/6C (0.49 cents), 548/1C (0.52 cents), 548/1F (0.30 cents) and 548/1A (0.30 cents), at Poovayeepatty Village, Vadaseri Post, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District.

Page No. 2 of 5

2. The grievance of the petitioner is that, despite the petitioner having submitted objections dated 10.12.2025, the fourth respondent, without considering the same and solely on the basis of the application submitted by the sixth respondent, conducted a survey and erected boundary stones in the subject property.

3. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the first to fourth respondents, on instructions, would submit that the survey had already been conducted and boundary stones had also been fixed in respect of the property, which is an undivided property, and that the property cannot be subdivided except pursuant to an order of the competent civil court.

4. Recording the above submission, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

[K.SURENDER, J.] 12.02.2026 JEN Index : Yes / No Page No. 3 of 5

To 1.The District Collector, Karur District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kulithala Taluk, Karur District.

3.The Tahsildar, Kulithala Taluk, Karur District.

4.The Sub Inspector of Surveyor, Kulithala Taluk, Karur District.

5.The Sub Inspector, Thogamalai Police Station, Karur District.

Page No. 4 of 5

K.SURENDER , J.

JEN 12.02.2026 Page No. 5 of 5