K.Saraswathi v. The Commissioner

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.01.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE. S. SOUNTHAR K.Saraswathi ...Plaintiff/Appellant/Appellant /Vs./ The Commissioner, Karur Municipality, Karur.

...Defendant/Respondent/ Respondent PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the judgment and decree in A.S.No.50 of 2004 dated 29.11.2004 on the file of the District Judge, Court at Karur confirming the judgment and decree in O.S.No.915 of 1998 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court at Karur, dated 29.12.2003. For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.P.Jeyaraman

JUDGMENT

When the matter was listed on 12.01.2023, the learned counsel for the appellant made an endorsement reporting 'no instructions'. Therefore, 1/4

the Registry was directed to remove the name of the learned counsel for the appellant and print the name of the appellant. 2.Today, the second appeal is listed under the caption 'for dismissal' and the name of the appellant is also printed in the cause list. However, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.

19.01.2023 Index: Yes / No Internet: Yes / No ta 2/4

TO:

1.The District Court, Karur.

2.The Principal District Munsif Court, Karur. 3.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

S. SOUNTHAR, J.

ta Judgment made in Dated:

19.01.2023 4/4