Madras High CourtWP(MD)/15695/2013dismissed as infructuous

Nafeesha @ Valli, v. The Sueprintendent Of Police,

2022-08-24Honourable Mr Justice K.Murali Shankar4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.08.2022 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2013 Nafeesha @ Valli ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin.

2.The Inspector of Police, Arumuganeri Police Station, Tuticorin.

3.The Inspector of Police, Caddalore Head Police Station, Caddalore.

4.P.Devaraj ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner and further direct the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 16.09.2013. 1/4

For Petitioner : Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah For R1 to R3 : Mr.R.Meenakshi Sundaram Additional Public Prosecutor For R4 : No Appearance

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner and further directing the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 16.09.2013. 2.Admittedly, the petitioner is the daughter of the fourth respondent. The petitioner has alleged that since she had embraced Islam, her father gave a life threat and also compelled her to convert into Hindu Religion with the help of the third respondent. 3.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner herself has given a statement stating that herself along with her husband are visiting her father's house and that she is not having any life threat. 2/4

4.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor may be recorded.

5.Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 24.08.2022 Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No sji To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin District, Tuticorin.

2.The Inspector of Police, Arumuganeri Police Station, Tuticorin.

3.The Inspector of Police, Caddalore Head Police Station, Caddalore.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

K.MURALI SHANKAR, J sji 24.08.2022 4/4