Amutha v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Third day of July Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.12357 of 2015 1 AMUTHA 2 DEEPA ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 2-3 Vs STATE REP BY:: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE USILAMPATTI ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MADURAI DT. (CR. NO.34 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT(S) / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A2 and A3, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 498(A) and 294(b) I.P.C., and Section 4 of Women Harassment Act, in Crime No.

34 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the accused have demanded more dowry from the de-facto complainant and also harassed her. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the main accused/A1, who is the husband of the de-facto complainant was arrested and released on bail.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the petitioners are the in-laws of the de-facto complainant. 5.Considering facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Usilampatti and on each of them https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 03/07/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, USILAMPATTI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI 3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE USILAMPATTI ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MADURAI DT.

+1. CC to M/S.P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate SR.No.36055 DM 24 JUNE 6 7 15

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.12357 of 2015 Date :03/07/2015 2P; 6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/