← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/12372/2015ordered

Balu v. The Inspector Of Police,

2015-07-03Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Third day of July Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.12372 of 2015 1 BALU 2 KITTU 3 SUBRAMANIYAN 4 VALLIKANNU ... PETITIONER(S) / ACCUSED 1 - 4 Vs STATE REP BY:: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, S.V. MANGALAM, THIRUPATHUR TK, SIVAGANGAI DT, CRIME NO.101/2015 ... RESPONDENT(S) / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.R.SENTHILKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 tp A4, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., and r/w.

Section 3 of PPDL Act in Crime No.101 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners broken the glass doors of the de-facto complainant and the same was questioned by him, the petitioners threatened the de-facto complainant with dire consequences.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the injured sustained only simple injury in the alleged occurrence. 5.Considering facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirupathur, Sivagangai District and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners No.1 and 3 shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m, for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation and the petitioners No.2 and 4 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 03/07/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUPPATHUR SIVAGANGAI DIST 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGANGAI 3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, S.V. MANGALAM, THIRUPATHUR TK, SIVAGANGAI DT,

1. CC to M/S.R.SENTHILKUMAR Advocate SR.No.35883 DM 6 7 15

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.12372 of 2015 Date :03/07/2015 2P; 6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/