M/S. Thiagarajar Mills (P) Ltd v. Tamil Nadu Generation And
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :13.12.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. KUMARESH BABU W.P.(MD)Nos.5537 & 8067 of 2012 and M.P.(MD).Nos.1, 1 & 2 of 2012 M/s.Thiagarajar Mills Private Limited, Unit III, Rep by its General Manager, Nilakottai.
... Petitioner Vs.
1.Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, 3.State Load Dispatch Centre, Rep by its Superintending Engineer, ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 2nd respondent culminating in his impugned communication bearing LR.No.SE/DGL/AO/REV/F.Open/D.No.1531/2012 dated 12.04.2012, quash the same and direct the respondents not to deny any facility to the petitioner on the ground of pendency of W.P.(MD).No.5742 of 2011, wherein the demand of Rs.30,21,769/- is under challenge.
For Petitioner :Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan For Respondents :Mr.S.Deenadhayalan Standing Counsel ****** W.P.(MD).No.8067 of 2012 M/s.Thiagarajar Mills Private Limited, Unit III, Rep by its General Manager, Nilakottai.
... Petitioner 1/3
Vs.
1.Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director, ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 2nd respondent culminating in his impugned communication bearing Lr.No.SE/DEDC/DGL/AEE/GL/AE.1/HT DOC/D.No.424/12 dated 20.04.2012 quash the same and direct the respondents to forthwith provide the petitioner additional load of 650 KVA for their HT SC No.153, over and above the existing demand of 4,300 KVA, as sought for by the petitioner vide their application dated 19.01.2012 culminating in their letter dated 26.03.2012. For Petitioner :Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan For Respondents :Mr.S.Deenadhayalan Standing Counsel ****** COMMON ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petitions. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, these writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // /12/2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) sbn 2/3
To 1.The Chairman and Managing Director, 3.The Superintending Engineer, State Load Dispatch Centre, +1 CC to M/s.S.SRINIVASA RAGHAVAN, Advocate ( SR-61742[F] dated 13/12/2022 ) W.P.(MD)Nos.5537 & 8067 of 2012 and M.P.(MD).Nos.1, 1 & 2 of 2012 13.12.2022 RD(28/12/2022) 3P 5C 3/3