← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/8070/2018disposed of

S.Amsha v. The Inspector General Of

2018-04-13Honourable Mr Justice M.S. Ramesh2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.04.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH W.P.(MD)No.8070 of 2018 S.Amsha : Petitioner Vs.

1.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Pattinampakkam, Chennai - 600 028.

2.The District Registrar, Madurai South, Y.Otthakadai, Madurai District.

3.The Sub-Registrar - IV, Joint Sub Registrar Office, Madurai South, Y.Otthakadai, Madurai District.

: Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents not to make any further registration in pursuant to the Sale deed in Doc.No.1750 of 2014 dated 24.02.2014 on the file of the Sub Registrar - IV, Joint Sub Registrar Office, Madurai South, Y.Othakaddai, Madurai by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 01.02.2018.

For Petitioner : M/s.P.Yasmin Begum For Respondents : Mr.V.Anand Government Advocate

O R D E R

Heard M/s.P.Yasmin Begum, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.V.Anand, learned Government Advocate, who takes notice on behalf of the respondents.

2.By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 3.It is the grievance of the petitioner that her representation dated 01.02.2018 to consider his plea and accept his objection in making further registration in the sale deed dated 24.02.2014 has not been considered by the respondents till date and therefore, has filed the present writ petition. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.This Court has not expressed any of its view with regard to the merits of the representation made by the petitioner. It is needless to point out that whenever a representation of this nature is made, the respondents are duty bound to consider the same in one way or other. Non consideration of the same would amount to dereliction of their ordinary duties of their office and as such this Court would be justified in invoking its powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to direct them to consider the petitioner's representation within a stipulated time. 5.In view of the limited prayer sought for in this writ petition, there shall be a direction to the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 01.02.2018 on its own merits and take further action in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6.With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AS) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Pattinampakkam, Chennai - 600 028.

2.The District Registrar, Madurai South, Y.Otthakadai, Madurai District.

3.The Sub-Registrar - IV, Joint Sub Registrar Office, Madurai South, Y.Otthakadai, Madurai District.

+1cc to M/s.P.Yasmin Begum, Advocate, SR.No.61145 ORDER MADE IN W.P.(MD)No.8070 of 2018 13.04.2018 Myr https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ VB/JC/SAR 1/03.05.2018/2P/5C