R.Suresh v. The Director General Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.07.2015

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12470 of 2015 R.Suresh ... Petitioner / Defacto complainant Vs.

1. The Director General of Police, Office of the Director General of Police, Chennai.

2. The Inspector General of Police, Office of the Inspector General of Police, South Zone, Madurai.

3. The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Madurai City.

4. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police,

5. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Madurai.

6. The Inspector of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell, Tallakulam Police Quarters, Madurai City.

7. The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Madurai City.

8. The Inspector of Police,

9. Vasantha, Women Sub- Inspector of Police,

10. The Inspector of Police, C.B.C.I.D. Wing, MaduraiDistrict.

... Respondents / Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to direct the first respondent to direct the 8th and 9th respondents to withdraw the investigation in Crime No.33 of 2014 offence under Sections 294(b), 120(b), 406, 420, 506(I) of IPC and the same entrust to the investigation to the Inspector of Police, C.B.C.I.D, Madurai District. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Udhayakumar For R-1 to R-8 and R-10 : Mr.K.Anbarasan Government Advocate(Crl. Side)

O R D E R

Seeking a direction to the first respondent to direct the 8th and 9th respondents to withdraw the investigation in Crime No.33 of 2014 and transfer the same to the Inspector of Police, C.B.C.I.D, Madurai District for further investigation, the petitioner has come up with this petition.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for Respondent-1 to Respondent-8 and Respondent-10 and perused the records.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that despite the fact that the case is pending more than one year, no progress has been made. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the petitioner is not co-operating for the investigation. Objecting the said statement, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he himself was present before the Investigation officer and produced the relevant documents.

4. This court is not willing to go into the inter-se dispute. This court finds it suffice that a direction is issued to the fourth respondent, the Superintendent of Police, Madurai District to supervise and monitor the investigation. The petitioner is directed to furnish all the documents once again which was already said to have been given to the Investigation Officer. Thereafter, the Final Report will have to be filed within a period of four weeks.

5. This Criminal Original Petition is disposed of accordingly. Sd/-

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (Crl. side) / True Copy / SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1.The Director General of Police, Office of the Director General of Police, Chennai. 2.The Inspector General of Police, Office of the Inspector General of Police, South Zone, Madurai. 3.The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Madurai City. 4.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Madurai District. 5.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai.

6. The Inspector of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell, Tallakulam Police Quarters, Madurai City.

7. The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Madurai City.

8.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Madurai District.

9. The Inspector of Police, C.B.C.I.D. Wing,

10. The Sub-Inspector of Police, 11.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

C.C.to Mr.R.Udhayakumar, Advocate, SR No.36260 PJL SH:24.07.2015:3P/13C Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12470 of 2015 06.07.2015