Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/12501/2015allowed

Pushpam v. The Inspector Of Police,

2015-07-06Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Sixth day of July Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.12501 of 2015 1 PUSHPAM 2 RANJITHAM ... PETITIONER(S) / ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, AALANGULAM, TIRUNELVELI DT, CRIME NO.9/2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.J.ARUL PRAKASH Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.Prabha Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, in Crime No.9 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 498A, 354(A), 294(b), 406, 506(i) IPC r/w Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.According to the defacto complainant, the accused have demanded dowry and harassed her.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the respondent police.

4.Heard the learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) appearing for the State.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned (*)Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi and on each of them executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction to the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 06/07/2015 (*)AMENDED AS PER ORDER DATED 24/07/2015 MADE IN MP(MD)NO.1/2015 IN CRL.OP(MD)NO.12501/2015 Time is extended for a period of two weeks from the date on which the order copy is made ready, to execute the sureties Sd24/07/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ALANGULAM.

2 DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUNELVLEI. (*)3 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TENKAASI 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, AALANGULAM, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S.J.ARUL PRAKASH Advocate SR.No. 41067 TS/08.07.2015/2P -6C RL/7C - 3/8/2015

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.12501 of 2015 Date :06/07/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/