Karthick Raja v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 20/01/2021 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.NIRMAL KUMAR
1. Karthick Raja
2. Manjula
3. Kanagavalli ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.2 to 4 Vs State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Sellur Police Station, Madurai District.
Crime No.22/2021.
... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners: Mr.Mahendra Babu.N., Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.M.V.Chandrasekaran, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For an Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.22 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as Accused No.2 to 4, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC, and Section 4 of TNPWH Act, in Crime No.22 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, there was a wordy quarrel between the petitioners and the defacto complainant, in which, the petitioners said to have abused the defacto complainant by using filthy language and also attacked him and caused injuries. Based on the complaint given by the defacto complainant, the crime has been registered against the petitioners. 1/3
3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.
4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he seek anticipatory bail.
5.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), appearing for the respondent police submitted that the injured person has already been discharged from the hospital.
6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that due to previous enmity, the occurrence said to have taken place and the injured person has already been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 7.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or their appearance, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the Additional Mahila Court, Madurai District, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.
(b)the first petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. (c)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
(d)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;
2/3
(f)if the accused/petitioners thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
sd/- 20/01/2021 / TRUE COPY / / /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
TO 1 THE JUDGE, ADDITIONAL MAHILA COURT, MADURAI DISTRICT.
2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SELLUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.
3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.682 of 2021 Date :20/01/2021 vsg JM/VR/SAR II/29.01.2021/3P/4C 3/3