← Library
Madras High CourtCONT P(MD)/85/2020closed

A.Bootharaj, v. Thiru.Ramar, The Special Officer,

2020-02-19Honourable Mr Justice M.Duraiswamy,Honourable Mr Justice T. Ravindran2 pages

Cont.P.(MD) No.85 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.02.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN Cont.P.(MD) No.85 of 2020 in W.P.(MD) No.18506 of 2019 A.Bootharaj ... Petitioner -vsRamar The Special Officer The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat) Madurai East Panchayat Union Madurai District ... Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondent for wanton and willful disobedience of the order of this Court in W.P.(MD) No.18506 of 2019, passed on 27.09.2019.

Prayer in WP(MD). 18506/ 2019 :

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the entire records relating to the impugned proceedings of the 4th respondent in Na.Ka.No.833/2019/Thi3(2) dt.21.8.2019 and to quash the same as illegal.

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Selvanayagam For Respondent : Mr.V.R.Shanmuganathan Special Government Pleader

O R D E R

[Order of the Court was made by M.DURAISWAMY, J.] When the contempt petition is taken up for hearing, Mr.V.R.Shanmuganathan, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent, submitted that the respondent has complied with the orders of this Court made in W.P.(MD) No.18506 of 2019, dated 27.09.2019, by issuing a notice to the contempt petitioner and granting planning permission to the writ petitioner on 27.01.2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Cont.P.(MD) No.85 of 2020 and he has also produced a copy of the planning permission and approved plan to that effect. The same are also taken on record.

2. It is also pertinent to note that the contempt petitioner has submitted his objections before the Authority concerned, which according to the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent, were considered and thereafter, planning permission was granted to the writ petitioner.

3. In view of the above, we do not find any reason to keep the contempt petition pending and accordingly, the contempt petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) To:

To The Special Officer, The Block Development Officer, (Village Panchayat), Madurai East Panchayat Union, Madurai District.

+1 CC to M/s.Special Govt.Pleader ( SR-7293[F] dated 20/02/2020 ) Cont.P.(MD) No.85 of 2020 in W.P.(MD) No.18506 of 2019 19.02.2020 krk SDS (27.02.2020) 2P-3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2